So,
you all know that on Saturdays we do philosophy challenges, and I’ve
been focusing on wealth and poverty issues for the past couple of
months. Last week, or the week before, I asked a question about the
concept of a ‘fair wage’ and whether or not that was even a meaningful
term in a Capitalist society. This week, I want to build on that idea
some. Honestly, I think the previous question is a good one, but I also
think that we need to go farther with the question. I think, as a
general basis, the concept of a ‘fair wage’ has no meaning in a
generally Capitalistic society… unless that society is ‘just’. I
want to stress here that I am using ‘just’ in the Platonic sense of
‘rightly ordered’. In Plato’s philosophy justice was the virtue of
having a rightly ordered soul. That is to say that the three parts of
the soul (rational, spirited, and appetitive) were all doing what they
were intended to do, and not shirking their duties or usurping someone
else’s. Plato also sets this out in his just society where the Guardians
(rulers), Militia (soldiers), and Laborers (… … laborers…) were all
doing their jobs. The laborers weren’t trying to be rulers or soldiers,
and the soldiers weren’t trying to be laborers. However, rather than any
concept of rightly ordered roles, I want to argue that a capitalistic
society must have rightly ordered values (i.e. the importance that we
place on entertainment, education, health, exercise, virtue, income,
etc) in order for the concept of a ‘fair wage’ to have any meaning at
all. Further, I think (though I haven’t thought this argument through
entirely) that a capitalistic society with rightly ordered values could
not fail to have a truly fair system of wages. So, take this idea and
run with it. Agree? Disagree? Think I’m completely loopy and need to
become a communist? Write me a 1000 word story that exemplifies and
defends your response to this idea. Oh, and have fun!
No comments:
Post a Comment